Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God
Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God

Premier Vatican State Exclusive: The Eye of God


Size 5 ½
(Can be worn on necklace as well)
This is a highly unusual and absolutely gorgeous ring of 925 sterling silver and a genuine, massive opal. I love this ring so, so much, I have never seen anything like it before. The opal has constantly moving fiery flashes of colors and light, and a life of its own. This is an old ring, though how old the setting is, I do not know. The opal itself is ancient, thousands of years older than the setting.


One of our Premier items, this piece is very, very special to us. It is something that, when you see it, are near it, you know it is something that is just totally out of this world – and it is. By out of this world, we mean Divine. It is called, “The Eye of God" and it reveals the Truth, as God has seen it through his own eyes.

This piece was secured from an elite source of ours deep within the Vatican state, someone who has both the connections and access to some of the most Powerful people and Talismans in the world. This piece has never been in the hands of the public before, and we cannot sell it to just anyone. If, after reading this, you are serious about acquiring this, please email us at thehauntedhive@gmail.com

If you are one of the Truth Seekers of this Earth, who has been led here, to this page, at this moment, you are here for a reason; be it to purchase this for yourself or not, you are here for a reason and purpose, of that I have no doubt.

This is something you just cannot pass up. It is a piece you will never find again, anywhere.

There's a lot to this piece, so I'll start at the beginning.

In the Bible, as you know, Genesis tells us how God created the land and waters, creatures and humans, day and night, and all there is. The Bible tells us about the Garden of Eden, Moses, Mary, Babel, Solomon, The Great Flood, and the miracles, life, persecution, death and resurrection of Jesus. There’s records that span back to 6,000 years ago to learn what God has created, and to learn the history of Creation, but there is far, far more out there to be understood than what one can simply read or study, from The Bible, or any book.

The truth is, we know only what we are allowed to know, and see very little of what actual reality is. We know of history what we have read in books in school or seen in dramatized reenactments or animations on TV. Every book has an author; every show a writer, producer, a network. As far back as recorded history goes, there’s pretty much always been a head figure behind that record. The Ancient Egyptian Pharaohs were notorious for re-writing history, often having monuments and hieroglyphs of their predecessor(s) re-worked or covered with their own images and text.

Today, the vast majority of all educational historical media is biased (particularly so the farther West in the world one lives) and can vary dramatically from country to country. In Russia you’ll learn facts about WWII that the US will never teach their young students. In the US, we are taught a very sugar-coated version of history, with that sugar sprinkled over the USA’s morality, and the sake of current political correctness. We are taught biased history that reflects the beliefs of those who control the media.

What exactly is being covered up and re-written? A whole lot. But the most massive of all cover-ups, the biggest, massive-scale lie that has been perpetuated is that of evolution, and how the universe, and life, came to be.

Most of you are probably thinking things like, “but there’s SO much evidence for evolution! Darwin, fossils, Neanderthals, carbon dating, the geologic column, and don’t all scientists believe in evolution?”

The truth is, yes, many scientists do, but there's many who don’t. This isn’t the fault of their own, it is simply because they aren’t getting all of the information, because it is censored from academia today. Not only that, it’s much easier to go with the grain than against it, particularly when it comes to your career and something they’ve invested their lives in – all of their schooling, usually up to their PhD, thousands in student loans, their livelihood, their reputation….going against what everyone else believes is very, very tough.

Those who believe in God, that God created the universe aren’t usually accepted in the scientific community, they really have it rough. Let’s imagine you are a young budding scientist who believes God created everything, but for 12 years of school you are taught the opposite. Then in college you’re still taught the opposite, and are singled out and ridiculed if you believe that God created the universe. Good luck writing essays and papers on creation science and passing, because your professors will not accept it and give you a low or flunking score. Suppose you write a thesis based on a creationist world view; you won’t be able to get it published nor will you be able to get anyone to take you seriously in the scientific community.

Do you think Harvard is going to hire you in their science department if you’re going against evolution? No.

Then the evolutionary scientists will point you out saying don’t take you seriously, even if you have your PhD. They say those who don’t support evolution are not real scientists. They’re not allowed to take part in school text books, any major publications, nothing like that. They have a really hard time finding jobs, getting any kind of recognition, all because they believe the opposite of what “they" want us all to believe, because what you believe is the real truth.

So, what is being censored from academia? It’s things that, when you examine them honestly, intellectually, and logically, make perfect sense. First, let’s look at the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.


The 1st law is all about the conservation of Energy. Matter and energy are throughout everything in the universe. Everything is composed of it in some way. This law states that no matter how much matter or energy there is, you cannot have more or less. You cannot go from something to nothing, nor nothing to something. So where did all of the stuff in the entire universe come from? There is no scientific explanation that explains how something can be created from nothing. There’s no scientific model that allows something to be created from nothing.

Lets move on to the 2nd law, which states that everything in a closed (no outside influence) system will tend towards a state of equilibrium. If you have a glass of hot water and a glass of ice next to each other on a table in a room, both will eventually become the same liquid temperature.

Another part of this is that things will not increase in complexity and design. The word Entropy is important here – things will degrade. Order to chaos. For example, if you have a stack of papers on your desk, as people walk by, bumping into it, creating little drafts of wind, that stack will get sloppier and sloppier. It will not randomly organize and tidy itself up.

The problem is, evolution states 15 billion years ago, all of everything in existence somehow came to be from nothing, or a tiny dot, and somehow evolved into life, and somehow evolved into humans.

Imagine the portrait of Mona Lisa. Think logically. If neither of us saw how it was created, how do we know how it was created? An intelligence, or spontaneously? Most will agree there’s an intelligence behind the portrait, someone designed it. Why? Because it’s too complex, to detailed. Okay, well, what’s more complex, a portrait, or a human?

The complexity of the human body, that, evolution says happened randomly and spontaneously, without design, is impossible to happen randomly and spontaneously, without design. We have:
  • 10 fingers
  • 10 toes
  • 1 mouth
  • 1 nose
  • 2 eyes, each with 120 million photo receptors
  • A body with some 37 trillion cells (a number still notoriously difficult to compute) – varied in structure, purpose, and behavior.
  • All of those cells have grown out of a single zygote, a genetic blending of your parents that has doubled, quadrupled, and grown exponentially in number.
  • 2 million sweat glands that automatically regulate body temperature to within a fraction of a degree
  • A brain with over 100 billion cells, each with over 50,000 neuron connections to other brain cells, formed during your embryonic state with cells racing up a three-millimeter neural tube at a rate of 250,000 cells per minute.
  • A heart of 2 billion cells that is a tuned, auto-correcting, self-squeezing engine
  • 2 ears with over 24,000 hair cells that covert sound vibrations into electrical impulses
  • Additionally, there are the cells of your microbiome all coming together in a balanced equilibrium
  • Central nervous system
  • Vocabulary
  • Organs
  • Blood flow
  • Consciousness
  • Standard of morality
  • Self-awareness
And the vocal chords to say, “I don’t think I evolved into this”

All of this would have had to have evolved randomly, spontaneously.

How did the heart lungs, brain, blood, stomach, veins etc develop in the 1st animal and the animal survive? Did the animal have 10% of veins? Partial stomach? A partial heart? 2% of their digestive system? Where did the digestive juices come from? Where did the blood come from? Its eyes needed to be developed to see the food, the brain developed to obtain the food. We are irreducibly complex -an organism in life that can’t have its complexity reduced and still function.

A very simple example of irreducible complexity would be a Mouse trap. It has a base, snap bar, spring, stabilizing bar, and trigger mechanism. None could be removed and it still function. It is irreducibly complex.

Similarly, the eminent incumbent Darwinian, Richard Dawkins, declares:
“Evolution is very possibly not, in actual fact, always gradual. But it must be gradual when it is being used to explain the coming into existence of complicated, apparently designed objects, like eyes. For if it is not gradual in these cases, it ceases to have any explanatory power at all…we are back to
miracle, which is a synonym for the total absence of [naturalistic] explanation.”

Dr. Behe shows that the findings of molecular biology conclusively meet the test of Darwin and Dawkins. We are indeed back to miracle. “No one at Harvard University, no one at the National Institutes of Health, no member of the National Academy of Sciences, no Nobel prize winner–no one
at all can give a detailed account of how the cilium, or vision or blood clotting, or any complex biochemical process might have developed in a Darwinian fashion. But… all these things got here somehow; if not in a Darwinian fashion, then how?” The irreducible complexity of living cells–the fact that they function only with the simultaneous presence of all their parts–indeed signals the absolute failure of the Darwinian model.

As Behe writes, “just as the pleasing shape of a jetliner belies the complexity of its internal organization, so the complexity of life mushrooms as one gets closer to its foundation. The shape of the eye, which Darwin tried to explain, pales in comparison with the interactions of
rhodopsin, transducin, arrestin, rhodopsin kinase, and other proteins in the visual cascade. Explaining how the swimming behavior of a whale might be produced gradually…would be a walk in the park compared to explaining the bacterial swimming system–the flagellum, which requires more than 40
gene parts to function…Astonishingly, science’s own journals contain no explanations….[Strictly speaking], Darwinism is not science.”


Let’s assess the Mathematical probability of life developing randomly, spontaneously over time. The evolutionists say life developed about 3 billion years ago. Okay, rather than calculating for 3 billion years, let’s pretend life began 30 billion years ago. It’s still not enough time for life to develop.

Now, the simplest protein molecule has 400 linked amino acids. Is 30 billion years enough time to create this one, single protein molecule?

Imagine, instead of a 400-piece puzzle, a 100-piece puzzle, which, like a protein molecule, it needs to be arranged in a very specific sequence. How do we determine how many sequences we have? A factorial. The total number of different possible combinations for a 100-piece puzzle is 10 to the 158thpower. That’s 1 with 158 zeros behind it.

For reference of perspective, there are not even that many atoms on this entire planet.

So, if we have 30 billion years, that’s surely enough time for a 100-piece puzzle to be solved, right?

Well, in 30 billion years, there’s 10 to the 18th power of seconds.

Now, divide 10 to the 158th power of number of combination options by 10 to the 18th power number of seconds in 30 billion years. The answer is 10 to the 140th power number of combination changes that would have to take place every second on the second for 30 billion years, before the laws of probability say we would come across the correct combination sequence to solve a 100-piece puzzle. Again, the absolute simplest protein molecule has 400 linked amino acids in very distinct order, not 100.

“If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous successive slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down" – Charles Darwin

The evolutionists still have to explain how life came from no life, called abiogenesis. Mind you, there is no scientific evidence at all to explain how life came from non-life. It is not scientifically logical to believe.

You can stare at a glass of water for 15 billion years, mix some sand in it, but life is never going to just spontaneously form.

Scientists who are pro evolution like to claim they’re “getting close" to generating life. No. They’re not getting close to generating life, that’s like saying you’re “close" to getting pregnant. No. You’re either pregnant or you’re not.

When a woman gets pregnant, its not that woman or the man or them together creating life, it’s being creating by God. Scientifically and medically we don’t know how when a sperm and egg join you have 23 chromosomes that fuse together, how bones start to form, how the heart forms, how the brain gradually forms. All scientists do is record what they observe. The smartest people on the planet have no clue how it comes into existence. They just take pictures and describe the process as it happens.


No macro evolution has ever been observed. Micro evolution is a shift of existing genetic information; Lateral adaptation; shuffling existing genes. Cane toads, for example had short legs, and were then eaten. 1 was born with longer legs. This became dominant in 1 toad. He would tend to survive and passed that dominant gene down to offspring, and over 79 years, long legs survived, none with shorter legs. This is not Darwinian evolution. The genetic info for the longer legs was there the whole time, it’s not evolved into something different.

There is way more genetic info instilled within every being and creature on this Earth than what’s used.

Put dogs in a colder environment and their fur will thicken. If you have any outdoor cats, you’ll notice how as the colder weather sets in throughout the fall and into winter, you’ll see how their fur thickens, how dense it gets. Even with humans, our hair tends to shed at a higher rate in warmer months. This is built into each animal’s genetic code. It is Lateral adaptation. This has been observed and documented.

Macro evolution is Darwin’s evolution, where animals evolved into different kinds of animals. This is what is taught in every public school in America and most all the Western world. Did you know that there is zero evidence for this? It has never ever actually been observed. Pro evolution scientists will often try to use micro evolution examples to support macro evolution, but they are two completely different things. Micro is a dog’s fur thickening in the winter, whereas Macro is a dog turning into a cow.

Perhaps the most common tactic is using the Galapagos islands as a means to prove macro evolution. According to those preaching an evolutionist standpoint, the fact that the beaks on the finches changed, getting longer to reach food better, is somehow proof of how evolution happened throughout history. No. God instilled those Genes in them, it is micro evolution, they are still finches.

There would need to be a generational increase in genetic information for macro evolution to be. It’s not possible.

If evolution is true, we are just random mutations of growth. How, then, would we all be symmetrical? We should look like some strange Picasso painting. There is no reason for us to be designed symmetrically – mammals, humans, birds, fish – there is no reason of survival or natural selection for symmetry.

Eyebrows, for example, what’s the survival purpose of eyebrows? There are little areas all over the body that are not necessary for survival, but rather, make life more convenient.



The paper geologic column doesn’t exist in real life. The one you see in school textbooks is not real. You’ll only find it on paper.

The Fossil record itself shows evolution is scientifically impossible.

If everything evolved from a common ancestor, in slow progressive steps – like evolution states – then in between, during the process of said evolution, there should be transitional creatures.

If evolution is true, then we should be able to find mostly transitional creatures in fossils. If evolution is true, the vast majority of creatures that have ever lived on this planet would have been these “in between" creatures, and comparatively there would be a much lesser number of single species, non in-between creatures. Therefore, what we would find in fossils would arguably be mostly these in-between creatures, and it would be rarer to find a single species, non in-between creatures.

In the fossil record, however, there are no transitional fossils, no transitional bones. None. Some claim there are transitions, however, this is a commonly used tactic of deception when they come across what is merely a deformity. If creation Is true, then we should find exactly what we have found.

Most people do not know, and most creation scientists weren’t taught, that the geological column doesn’t exist in real life in the order they’re supposed to be according to evolution. Compare your old school text book to the side of any Mountain. Really. Take any school textbook to the side of any mountain and compare it. It’s all mixed and out of sequence, just as it should be if there was a massive flood. Anywhere you look on earth, you will find this.

The entire geologic column itself is full of polystrate fossils which show evolution is impossible, and prove there was, indeed, the Great Flood.

Polystrate fossils are fossils – usually tree trunks – that stand upright, punching vertically through a bunch of geological layers. Hence the name, ‘poly' = many; ‘stratum' = layer.

Those layers do NOT represent those millions of years the science books claim they do. There are tens of thousands of these fossils all over the planet that have been found. This will never be put into school textbooks. Evolutionists cannot explain it.

Most of you have heard of or remember the eruption of Mount Saint Helens. The energy in the blast from her was so severe, the entire forest around her was laid bare. All the branches were stripped from the trees, the trees were ripped from their roots, you can see in photos it looked like there were telephone poles strewn all over.

Now, it was observed that many of these stripped trees, which looked like telephone poles, floated out into the lake, creating log mats. So, you have all these telephone pole like stripped trees floating on water, and they would then get water logged, turning them vertically, bobbing in water. These stripped, bobbing trunks would then get so water logged, they would then sink to the bottom, like a torpedo, punching down, into the mud. This was observed in the 80s.

Now, let’s go back beyond the 80s, to 4,500 years ago, to the Great Flood. During this time there was massive volcanic activity, and all over the Earth the same thing that happened at my saint Helen’s happened worldwide – a bunch of stripped trees, like telephone poles bobbing then sinking into the mud at the bottom of the watery deep.

Tens of thousands just like the ones from Mount Saint Helens litter the entire geologic column all over the entire planet. The continents shifted, and like a blanket on the floor, if you push the blanket, it has a buckling effect. And thus, the mountains came forth and the valleys were created. Whatever was at the bottom should have been pushed up to the tops of the mountains. The mountaintops should have invertebrates if they were once at the bottom of the seas. Do you know what has been found all over earth's mountaintops? Invertebrate fossils, worms, clams, trilobites……


When bones are found, scientists measure it by what rocks are around it, and measure the age of the rocks by the bones.

“Scientists determine when fossils were formed by finding out the age of the rocks in which they lie.” – World Book Encyclopedia Vol 7, page 364

“The age of the rocks are determined by the fossils found in them.” – World Book Encyclopedia Vol 15, page 85

They use each other to age date each other. Its called circular reasoning.

Radiometric dating is only done on certain kinds of rocks. Carbon dating is not done on bones that are supposedly millions of years old. It’s only done on organic young material. Even the creator of carbon dating himself acknowledges it can’t be done on anything older than about 50,000 years. Frankly, it’s not reliable if the specimen is older than a few thousand years in age.

One type of radiometric dating is potassium argon dating, where they compare the ratio of potassium and argon to determine the age of, say, an igneous rock. Say they determine that rock is, for example, 10 million years old, any bones that are found within that rock they will also say are 10 million years old.

This is still not reliable. It doesn’t work. Case in point, again, with Mount Saint Helens. It erupted in the 80s, and in the 90s, a small group of creation scientists collected 5 samples from the very rock which came from the hardened lava that flowed from the 80s eruption of Mount Saint Helen’s. They sent it to Geochron Laboratories in Cambridge, Massachusetts (one of the premier, leading laboratories in the country) to have it radiometrically dated. They did not tell them they were creation scientists, and they didn’t tell them the samples came from Mount Saint Helens. The results were:
340,000 years old
350,000 years old
900,000 years old
1.7 million years old
2.8 million years old

Yet they were all technically less than 10 years old.

Now, this is not determining how long the lava was underground for before it erupted, but how long it’s been since it hardened into rock form outside of the volcano, how long that rock has been a rock.

That obviously doesn’t make any sense but that’s how the dating presented itself .

Similarly, a group took 11 samples from a 1954 volcanic eruption in New Zealand and sent it to Geochron Laboratories. Those all came back ranging in all kinds of ages up to 3.5 million years old, yet, it reality, it was under 40 years old.

From an 1801 volcanic eruption of Hualalai (one of five volcanoes whose eruptions built the island of Hawaii), from the upper Kaupulehu flow, 12 samples were taken which ranged on the young end with results of 140 million years old, all the way up to 1.41 billion years old.

Not one time ever has an igneous rock which we know the date of the rock, been radiometricaly dated to the correct age. Every single time, 100% shoes them always to be 100,000 years, millions of years, never 20, 40, 50, etc. So why should we believe that when someone says a rock is 50 million years old, when with 100% consistency, it’s been proven wrong?

There’s a ton of other evidence that proves that the earth cannot be billions of years old. As found on Creation.com
https://creation.com/how-old-is-the-earth, with many links that cited much of the same information provided throughout this listing:
The earth’s magnetic field and decay rate of the magnetic field doesn’t allow for that. The earth’s magnetic field has been decaying so fast that it couldn’t be more than about 10,000 years old. Rapid reversals during the flood year and fluctuations shortly after just caused the field energy to drop even faster.

The levels of Helium in the atmosphere doesn’t allow for that. Helium is pouring into the atmosphere from radioactive decay, but not much is escaping. But the total amount in the atmosphere is only 1/2000 of that expected if the atmosphere were really billions of years old. This helium originally escaped from rocks. This happens quite fast, yet so much helium is still in some rocks that it couldn’t have had time to escape—certainly not billions of years.

A supernova is an explosion of a massive star—the explosion is so bright that it briefly outshines the rest of the galaxy. The supernova remnants (SNRs) should keep expanding for hundreds of thousands of years, according to the physical equations. Yet there are no very old, widely expanded (Stage 3) SNRs, and few moderately old (Stage 2) ones in our galaxy, the Milky Way, or in its satellite galaxies, the Magellanic clouds. This is just what we would expect if these galaxies had not existed long enough for wide expansion.

The moon is slowly receding from earth at about 1½ inches (4 cm) per year, and the rate would have been greater in the past. But even if the moon had started receding from being in contact with the earth, it would have taken only 1.37 billion years to reach its present distance. This gives a maximum possible age of the moon—not the actual age. This is far too young for evolution (and much younger than the radiometric ‘dates’ assigned to moon rocks).

Sodium levels in the sea doesn’t allow for that. Salt is pouring into the sea much faster than it is escaping. The sea is not nearly salty enough for this to have been happening for billions of years. Even granting generous assumptions to evolutionists, the seas could not be more than 62 million years old—far younger than the billions of years believed by evolutionists. Again, this indicates a maximum age, not the actual age.

Not to mention the erosion levels of mountains, the mud levels on the sea floors….all these things make it impossible for the earth to be billions of years old.

But some might say, but what about fossils? Surely, they must be millions of years old? No. Fossilization takes place fairly quickly actually.

When something fossilizes, all it is doing is taking on the shape of a rock. When you have a bone that fossilizes, the organic material is decaying, and if its in the right conditions, minerals (mineral water) go in and fill in the gaps and holes, what’s left of bone material surrounded by mineral that dries out and becomes rock, so you have a rock left in the shape of that bone.

Right now, in creation science museums there are plenty of modern items that are completely fossilized, like bowler hats, derby hats, bags of flour, wheels, even a fossilized foot inside s cowboy boot.


Carbon 14 dating is used only in dating organic material. All living things absorb c14. When they die, c12 remains stable whilst c14 is released with a half life of 5730 years. Eventually there won’t be enough c14 to even register, which happens between 40,000 to 50,000 years. Even Willard Libby, the man who developed Carbon dating and won a Nobel prize for it, says you cannot date something older than 40,000 to 50,000 years because there wouldn’t be enough c14 left in it.

C14 is fairly inconsistent most of the time. Fresh seal skins were dated to be 1,300 years old, a living mollusk was dated to be 2,300 years old, a variety of
Antlers ranged from 5,300 to 10,000 years old. When you test things only a few hundred years old it’s more reliable, but when you have something a few thousand years old or more, it’s usually going to measure its older than it actually is.

If dinosaurs died 65 million years ago, they’d have no c14 left. If you ask an evolutionary scientist to carbon date dinosaur bones they’ll laugh at you.

Did you know that Creation scientists have used carbon dating to date many dinosaur bones? Did you know that there’s countless examples of dinosaur bones registering levels of c14?

In 1990, samples of dinosaur bones were taken to the University of Arizona Department of Geosciences Laboratory of Isotope Geochemistry. It was a blind procedure; the technicians were not told they were dinosaur bones. One measured to be 9,890 years old, another measured 16,120 years old. This suggests that they did not die 65 million years ago, clearly. There’s been many, many dinosaur bones that show carbon14 in them, and, many that still have SOFT TISSUE in them. Red blood cells and hemoglobin have been found in some dinosaur bone. But these could not last more than a few thousand years—certainly not the 65 million years from when evolutionists think the last dinosaur lived.


The fossilized remains of a previously unknown species of dinosaur, called Velafrons coahuilens, a duck billed creature some 25 feet long was unveiled by an international research team led by scientists from the Utah Museum of Natural History.

Found in the Cerro del Pueblo Formation, the sedimentary layers in which the remains of the animal were buried were thick, many meters thick, with the formation itself deposited in the extensive Parras Basin, many kilometers of deposit.

They actually say that the sediments are aged at 72 million years old based on the kinds of fossils found and that the average deposition rate for the formation was about 0.55 mm per year, based on magnetostratigraphic data.

There are a ton of high quality, well-preserved fossils found there in large beds, jumbled together, with both terrestrial and marine animals buried together.

There were numerous multi-meter beds of massive mudstone that coarsened upwards, suggesting repeated, enormous and extensive mudflows, and often displayed what is called ‘soft sediment deformation’, meaning it deposited so quickly that the beds slumped and moved before they had time to settle.

The evolutionists tried to reconstruct the type of conditions that would be needed for this to happen, but by ignoring The Great Flood, they could not find a plausible explanation. They struggled to find any modern theory or analogy. The only thing that they could come up with was that during the Cretaceous period, which is recognized as a period of high sea levels around the world, that there must have just been some powerful storms like the ones that occur around the southern tip of Africa and South America today. The only thing is these storms don’t kill and bury entire herds of animals and create massive animal graveyards that are meters upon meter thick.

For something 25 feet long, its remains would have needed to be buried pretty quickly to be preserved, which would require a considerable quantity of sediment for something so large to be fossilized so well.

If this took millions of years, it would make no sense at all, but a massive flood would make sense. Such a huge depth of sediment would not accumulate unless the relative sea level in the area was rising continuously to provide the needed conditions.

These animals could not be buried and preserved at such a slow sediment accumulation rate. It was obvious that the settlements indicated that there was a massive catastrophe involving massive amounts of water.

Now, some of you may be thinking, “but what about this opal? Isn’t it Millions of years old?” All opals and opalized bones formed as a result of the catastrophic judgment brought to this Earth in the Great Flood. How so? Let’s compare what the evolutionists say, compared to what actual science tells us.

Opals are made of common ingredients – similar to the glass in windows, ground water carrying dissolved silica seeps through beds of sand and grit, and the silica particles deposit into the cracks. As the water evaporates, the silica particles are ‘cemented’ together to form the opal.

Sometimes bones, seashells and seed pods are found fossilized by having been ‘turned’ into opal. The most famous example being Eric the pliosaur, who the evolutionists claim to be about 100 million years old.

It is a common thought that fossils, opals, and Crystal’s take millions and millions of years to form. Evolutionists claim that opals formed some 30 million years ago, with the host rocks being some 65–70 million years old.

This is not true. In fact, fossils can form in a matter of months, as can opals, though crystals range from weeks to hundreds of years.

Len Cram, a Lightning Ridge scientist who earned his Ph.D. for his opal research, whose quest has always been to find out how opal forms so as to discredit uniformitarian (slow and gradual) geological theories, actually discovered the secret to “growing" opals in a matter of only weeks, in glass jars, in his wooden shed laboratory,

Even scientists from Australia’s CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization) and experienced Lightning Ridge miners can’t distinguish the difference between Cram's opals and opals found in the ground, even under an electron microscope, they look identical.

Opals took only a few months to form within suitable portions of the thick sediment layers laid down catastrophically during The Great Flood.

All it takes is an electrolyte (a chemical solution that conducts electricity), a source of silica and water, and some alumina and feldspar.

“The opal-forming process is one of ion exchange, a chemical process that involves building the opal structure ion by ion (an ion is an electrically charged atom, or group of atoms [molecule]). The process starts at some point and spreads until all the critical ingredients, in this case the electrolyte, are used up. Within a matter of weeks of this initial formation, the newly forming opal has beautiful colour patterns, but it still has a lot of water in it. Slowly over months, further chemical changes take place, the silica gel consolidating as the water is ‘squeezed’ out.

Len can now ‘grow’ opal in natural Lightning Ridge opal dirt, the sandy grit in which the natural opals are found. Once the electrolyte is mixed into the opal dirt, colour starts to form within four to six days. Seams of opal then actually grow, identical in shape and form to that found in the ground, some with colour and some without, the process taking about three months. The seam opal is not necessarily a sedimentary deposit in previously existing cracks in the opal dirt. Rather, the chemical reaction which ‘creates’ the opal makes the seam from the opal dirt itself where no crack or seam previously existed. Len says this achievement is a ‘world first’, and that viscosity evidently plays a major role in this crucial ion-exchange process.

Rapid opals fit Bible’s timescale. Len’s experiments not only provide an explanation of how opals form, but the short timescale of only a matter of years is consistent with the biblical framework and can readily account for the field observations of natural opal in its host rocks. Furthermore, this means that his short timescale also applies to the fossilization process. The bones of ‘Eric’ the pliosaur (for example) need not have taken thousands or millions of years to fossilize. The most likely explanation of their preservation via opalization is now therefore the same replacement (ion-exchange) process that Len has so graphically demonstrated in his glass jars, and that takes only months to years.

So, the evolutionary ‘stories’ of opal formation and fossilization slowly over thousands and millions of years have to be rewritten. Since pliosaurs and other creatures need to be buried catastrophically to ensure their subsequent fossilization, the rock layers hosting the opals and opalized bones are best explained by catastrophic deposition during the global Flood. Chemical processes then took over to form the opals in the rock layers and opalize the bones in the months and years that followed.” – Creating Opals, Opals in months—not millions of years by Dr. Andrew A. Snelling on December 1, 1994, Originally published in Creation 17, no 1 (December 1940): 14-17


Thanks to the brilliantly creative minds of Hollywood (that’s sarcasm there), most people think they’re familiar with what a caveman is. You know, a lion cloth from a woolly mammoth, a club in one hand to clumsily bash his cave neighbor if he got too close to his meat, and his cavewoman's hair in the other hand, grunting “MAKE SANDWICH”.

Well, throughout recorded history, people have always lived in caves. Right now at this very moment there’s thousands of people all over the earth living in caves, particularly in the middle east. They are technically cavemen and cavewomen, but they certainly aren’t Neanderthals, right?

Evidence actually shows that Neanderthals crafted tools, had burial ceremonies, practiced religion, and their manual dexterity was just the same as ours is today. But they looked so different – the brow ridge is prominent; the cranium was longer. There are a number of theories as to why this is. Deformity is a possible theory, however, it’s not likely. Another theory is that they were suffering from Acromegaly, like the famous wrestler, Andre the Giant. But there is another reason why the earliest humans looked so different, and that reason can be found in the Bible. But before we get to that, you first must learn about Dr. Jack Cuozzo.

Dr. Jack Cuozzo, USS Enterprise Navy Lieutenant, Professor of Biology and orthodontist, who studied at Loyola, Georgetown, and University of Pennsylvania, has studied paleontology for over 30 years. In his practice as an orthodontist, he has used the Cephalometric radiograph to map out the growth pattern of a child’s jaw to know whether or not that child would have room for wisdom teeth or not.

He noticed that the human skull continues to grow and change shape as we get older. The ears and nose grow, the cranium grows longer, and the brow ridge gets thicker. If you know someone who is 80 or 90 who still has a hat they used to wear when they were 20, ask them to try it on, it’ll be too tight.

In an ingenious and original move, blending paleontology and orthodontics, he took the skull of a 20 year old, a 30 year old, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 year old to extrapolate a growth pattern just as he did for children in his orthodontic practice. Based on the growth pattern, if one’s skull were allowed to grow for several hundred years, it looked identical to a Neanderthal, exactly. He even said when he saw it, “I about fell off my chair!”

How could this be? The reason why may surprise you. The reason why the brow ridge gets thicker as we age is due to chewing. When we chew food, it puts pressure on the bones above the eyes. As the skull has a measure of viscosity to it, the brow ridge gets thicker because of it. This is why a hat worn by someone when they were 20 will be too tight when they’re 80.

Now, remember what is said in the Bible? People lived hundreds of years. Methuselah lived to be 969. Noah lived to be 950. Adam lived to be 930. Shem lived to be 600. Enoch lived to be 365. Isaac lived to be 180. Abraham lived to be 175. The accumulation of hundreds of years of chewing would mean the brow ridge would become very, very thick, exactly like a Neanderthal.


Evolutionists have, unsurprisingly, their own theory about our DNA. According to evolutionary scientists, most of our DNA is, “junk".

I really hate referring to it as “junk DNA”, but for the ease in comprehensive understanding, I will for the moment be referring to it as such, as the evolutionists do.

Junk DNA accounts for 95-98% (depending upon the source) of our total DNA, and, according to the standard, widespread evolutionary science – does not contain instructions (encoded protein sequences) for the development of the form of any organism.

Doesn’t it seem just a bit odd that 95-98% of our DNA is nothing but wasted space – according to evolutionary science? As the theory of evolution is all about “survival of the fittest", and that unnecessary, wasteful things are left behind in the dusts of nature's time, their theory on what 95%-98% of our DNA is, contradicts the fundamental core base of the theory of evolution itself.

You see, we were intended to be beings of a much higher existence than humans are today. Humankind was originally made "in God's Image", not referring to physical appearance, as God's form transcends the physical, but, as Divine beings of immortal wisdom, enlightened, free from sin, One with the universal Creator, with naturally inherent divine consciousness in the likeness of God. Each of us has been designed with our own divine DNA blueprint; a unique and beautiful lineage encoding who we are physically and spiritually. There are 12 strands in total, which completely encapsulate our entire body, spirit, and soul, our complete spiritual matrix, connecting us to God directly. However, with the fall from the Garden of Eden, we only have access to about 2 to 5% of our DNA, the double helix of 2 strands, the rest remaining latent, ethereal strands. These 2 hold the programming for our bodies, our physical, chemical body and its perfect imperfections; the rest hold everything else.

……and the list of information that is purposely censored from the public and academia goes on, and on, and on.

So much is hidden and concealed from us from those that have the power and control, and most are blinded to it. On top of that, thanks to Adam and Eve, God locked humankind's divine consciousness, which even more are blind to. All of humankind was forced to pay for the disobedience of Adam and Eve, making us – comparatively – the simple mortals we have since always been, and still are today. We are denied Knowledge and Awareness from God himself, not so much as punishment, but it is what drives one to have faith or not.

“He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, he has put eternity into man's heart, yet so that he cannot find out what God has done from the beginning to the end.” – Ecclesiastes 3:11

We cannot comprehend the infinite existence of God, which is why many don’t believe that God exists. No, one cannot prove definitively that God exists, but neither can you definitively prove that George Washington was our first President. You would need a video rerecording him to do that. But what God had given us, is the free will to choose whether we believe in Him or not, and He has given us the cerebral capacity to be able to prove that it is scientifically illogical to believe that God does not exist. But that is where those in Power come in. They will do anything and everything to remove God from the consciousness of we, the people.

And thus, we live in a society where many are stressed, depressed, anxious, we create wars, we face difficulties with love, self-criticism, vanity, hubris, and judgement, as we have a broken connection with the universe, with the truth, and with God.

The truth is, that what we think we know about reality is not what reality really is. As we experience it, be it in the present or what we think we know of the past, it is a clouded, doctored illusion.

Our reality has been created for us, a terrible lie orchestrated by man, by those few whose grip of control is near limitless, and the effects of which reach every corner of our world, save for the most remote of tribes who do not welcome modernization.

Those who have this kind of power will do whatever it takes to never lose it. Everything around us is there for a reason. From the latest 5g all the way down to our toothpaste, it all is connected by money trails, secret handshakes and the heavy hand of the New World Order.

Why do you think they banish and shun the things they do, ignoring any and all true reasoning, and manipulating and controlling until everyone’s brainwashed?

Why do you think they suppress things that genuinely, truly heal us that are holistic and out of the grips of big pharma? Why are things which elevate our consciousness most often considered taboo and/or are outlawed? For example, cannabis is a Schedule I drug according to the DEA, along with heroin. According to them, it’s just as bad, defined as “drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.” They make it next to impossible for anyone to actually research, financially and logistically. They also include peyote, which has specifically long been a focus of Native American and pre-Colombian ceremonial religious traditions of Spiritual and cerebral advancement, though it’s also used in other contexts elsewhere, including in meditation and psychotherapy. Ecstasy too, which, yes, it’s been widely, widely abused, it does actually has absolutely incredible qualities that could be applied in various therapies (PTSD, marriage counseling, past emotional unhealed, unprocessed traumas, etc) and it is an unparalleled mode of finding spiritual and cerebral advancement. Now, I’m not saying go out and do drugs, but what I am saying is that all 3 of these drugs, if the Powers at be allowed for controlled therapeutic and religious use, could completely revolutionize the consciousness of an entire generation. But we are not even given the opportunity to explore because of all the red tape.

In a world where there is so much to be seen and a life where there is so much to be discovered, it is overshadowed by lies, manipulation, social programming, and control by man, those who do not want us to know the truth about ourselves, about the universe, and about God.

The only one who knows all the real truth in this Universe is God.

“And no creature is hidden from his sight, but all are naked and exposed to the eyes of him to whom we must give account” – Hebrews 4:13

So, what does all of this have to do with this piece here?


This isn’t called The Eye of God for kicks and giggles. This incredible opal belonged to Noah, and was given to him by God after its creation, just about a year after The Great Flood. It is the only one which God has ever given to any man. It is called The Eye of God because it gives those who unlock its power the ability to see through God's eyes. All things that ever were, all things that have ever been, you will have the ability to see through the Eye of God. You will be able to see how the universe came to be, and what Magick lies within its creation. You will be able to use the divine brilliance of The Eye of God to lift the veils that have been forcibly placed upon you; to know the knowledge of God, and the knowledge of all the secrets that God has hidden from humanity. You will be able to see with the level of absolute clarity which only God possesses, to know the truth in any situation, any person, place, dream, or event.

Under the light of the new lens of godly perspective you possess, you will come to see what is unseen to others -those things which exist in other dimensions, parallel realities, and overlapping elements. See the old castles and ancient structures in their original glory as you see and understand how they were really used. See the rhythms and lifelines that exist between everything in nature. See the ancient structures in their original Glory and use. See the cosmos as God designed it, the energy fields and auras, the depths of the deepest planetary cores up to the throne upon which God sits with Jesus at his side.

You will be able to use this to shine light upon all the days of your life, to find meaning and design in the ordinary, to find beauty and purpose in all things.

Sever through the illusions, the lies, and facades. Attain the wisdom and knowledge to experience life and all things for what they really, truly are.

See through the eyes of God, see reality as it really exists. This is how God sees; so too shall you.

This is not all, either. The realities that exist around you are far more profound than words can adequately explain.

Once you have seen through God's eyes, an imprint is forever left upon your spiritual DNA, and will remain with you always, as a unilateral force for your advancement in all areas of life, spirit and soul.

Once you receive this, there is a ritual that is necessary. It is safe, and simple to do; one need not be an experienced practitioner to do it. 3 white candles must be lit (we will provide 3 white tea lights, so that you needn’t go out to the store during this time), placing this ring in the center, then there is a prayer you must recite. The exact positioning and details will be sent to you via email, not in the package, as a safety precaution.

It is important to keep this close to you when connecting to it. The entire ensemble of Godly energies within this will protect your body while your astral body travels. So, you should wear this, be it on a finger or wear it as a necklace, you can even keep it in your pocket.

How you choose to connect with this incredible, ancient opal is your own personal preference. I myself highly recommend meditation. After others have fallen asleep, when your home is still and quiet, free from environmental distractions, find a comfortable place to sit or lay down, focus on the sound of your breath, and drift into a meditative state. From there, the places you will go, the things you will see, experience, and understand, are quite literally, limitless.


For those of you interested in additional information about Creation Science and apologetics, there are some good resources out there, but they can be hard to find when the vast majority of the mainstream media is against such resources.

The following list is compiled from sites used in the creation of this listing, and from the website and Top Ten Proofs of Bob Dutko. A famed Christian radio talk show host, Christian Apologist and leading voice today in the fearless defense of Christian truth, Bob Dutko uses logic, reason, science, history and factual evidence to disarm the critics and equip believers. “While a belief in the Bible as God’s Word and a faith in Jesus Christ is not dependent upon science and logic, it is backed up by science and logic. Bob’s mission is to show people that if you examine the Bible with logic, evidence, facts, science, reason, intellect and history, you will see that Evolution really is false, the Bible really is true, God really does exist".

If you would like me to send you a link to the mp3 download of Bob Dutko's Top Ten Proofs, I would be happy to share it with you, it is a $129 value.